Nunnykirk club site

JohnG replied on 05/09/2019 19:24

Posted on 05/09/2019 19:24

We have had a seasonal pitch at Nunnykirk for several years now and love it. 

We've just received our September magazine with the application form for 2020 seasonal. When I looked at it with the intention of applying for next year I found Nunnykirk missing. I assumed it was possibly a printing error and phoned the club. 

I was told they'd already had several calls on this topic but he could only tell me that the regional manager had decided not to allow seasonal pitches on site for next year. 

To me this is a very strange decision. Nunnykirk has 75 pitches and about 30 of these are seasonal. If you remove the seasonal pitches then quite a lot of the time you will be lucky to have a dozen units on site. 

The club is losing roughly £31,000 by removing the seasonal pitches. It doesn't make economic sense to me and I wonder if the club is ultimately looking to close Nunnykirk  

young thomas replied on 12/09/2019 12:04

Posted on 12/09/2019 12:04

thanks Ro, I'm sure your post has added a view as to the future of this site and the use of seasonal pitches there.smile 

ABM replied on 12/09/2019 12:10

Posted on 12/09/2019 12:10

Can't speak for Nunnykirk, CS, but the other non-fac sites I have used were regularly empty / full depending on local events.

All bar my favourite which I have seldom seen less than 3 / 4 full !

 

Which one is that did you ask ? --  you must be jesting --  I ain't telling  wink

peedee replied on 12/09/2019 12:19

Posted on 12/09/2019 12:19

Thank you Ro for a repsonse. I hope this is not the thin end of wedge and there are more non facility sites on the edge of extinction? I hope before the Club gives up the lease of such sites they at least look at operating them in a different way, e.g. part time manning with barrier controlled entry and card payment.

peedee

Cornersteady replied on 12/09/2019 13:06

Posted on 12/09/2019 12:19 by peedee

Thank you Ro for a repsonse. I hope this is not the thin end of wedge and there are more non facility sites on the edge of extinction? I hope before the Club gives up the lease of such sites they at least look at operating them in a different way, e.g. part time manning with barrier controlled entry and card payment.

peedee

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:06

But the club cannot keep running sites that run at a significant loss, it is obvious that this site has declining occupancy for whatever reasons, if no one wants to go there why should it be kept open?

Perhaps non facility sites are just not attractive to the vast majority of club members in today's market?

peedee replied on 12/09/2019 13:28

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:28

But the club cannot keep running sites that run at a significant loss

No they cannot that I will agree on but you can at least look at ways to reduce losses as well as improving occupancy before first closing them. Not everyone wants full facility sites all of the time at £30 per night.

peedee

Cornersteady replied on 12/09/2019 13:37

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:28 by peedee

But the club cannot keep running sites that run at a significant loss

No they cannot that I will agree on but you can at least look at ways to reduce losses as well as improving occupancy before first closing them. Not everyone wants full facility sites all of the time at £30 per night.

peedee

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:37

Not everyone wants full facility sites all of the time at £30 per night.

Indeed, but it would appear that far more people wanting those sort of sites than non facility sites? And that is the main point surely?

If the full fat sites are making more money and /or getting better occupancy than non facility sites which way should the club go? 

How could you improve occupancy on these non facility sites? Put in facilities?

peedee replied on 12/09/2019 13:39

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:39

I see the price has lept up by £3 per night from £15 to £18  for the 2020 season. Hardly the way to attract greater occupancy especially off peak.

peedee

young thomas replied on 12/09/2019 13:40

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:40

"they (should) at least look at operating them in a different way, e.g. part time manning with barrier controlled entry and card payment."

other small, no facs sites can be run with the minimum of cost, no manning required at all...

a machine to pay (card or cash) and get a barrier card, a barrier operated by said card and a water/waste Bourne included on barrier card.

its not difficult and its done all over Europe.....we're still part of it, for now, aren't we?

this one happens to be in a town that's a World Heritage Site.

...and a price comparison in a tourist hot spot....

Price: 11 € per night including parking, water and emptying. 

Payment by credit card or cash at the terminal.

peedee replied on 12/09/2019 13:41

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:41

If the full fat sites are making more money and /or getting better occupancy than non facility sites which way should the club go?

Depends on how many members it is prepared to lose!

peedee

Cornersteady replied on 12/09/2019 13:42

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:39 by peedee

I see the price has lept up by £3 per night from £15 to £18  for the 2020 season. Hardly the way to attract greater occupancy especially off peak.

peedee

Posted on 12/09/2019 13:42

If people are put off by the non facilities (And personally I think that is it) would more people go if the price was reduced?

Near Malvern Hills Club Campsite by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook