I was expecting to read a review , but it was more of a rant 

Yep, no sign of a site review at all just things the warden could have dealt with if he/she had been made aware. 

Agree with the above replies, this isn't a review, its just a moan. How did the wardens handle your complaint? Or did you not bother to make them aware of your findings, saving your rant for the website instead? 

The wardens should not need to be informed of people exceeding the speed limit, they should know, they are out there and witness this but turn a blind eye when it suits, furthermore if the fellow member wants to vent his feelings via the website then he's more than welcome to, it is a review of what he found on site, he may not wish to approach the wardens because of previous encounters with wardens on other sites, you carry on and review sites how you see fit, it is your prerogative.

Wardens cannot be all seeing.  Complaints can be made to a warden or direct to head office.

Site reviews are meant to be reviews of the site to give others an idea of what the site and local amenities are like. The behaviour of fellow members, like the weather, is not a constant factor.

The forum is the place for moans and, goodness knows, there are a lot of them. 

 Sounds like more of a review of dog owners rather than the site

This seems to be a review about dogs and their owners , I would like to read what the site is like and about what the area is like .