Club comparisons...

Content has been removed.

Yes CL do seem to be growing in popularity. The pop up sites are expensive because the Club provides electricity but even so they are still expensive for what they are. I can personally go without EHU so instead of the Beaulieu pop up I would use one of the Camping in the Forest sites or even a C&CC's THS. On my next trip out I have two CLs booked, a C&MC non facility site, a C&CC site and finally a C&MC full fat site. A good mix I think. The C&CC site, Sandringham, is £10p.n. cheaper than the adjacent C&MC site for the same type of pitch.

peedee

It is what it is. We can use whatever sites suit and remain members of whichever club suits. Once they no longer fit our bill, we can walk away. In other words, if it's not what we want, we can go elsewhere. That's really all there is to it and I don't see the point of making comparisons which will achieve nothing.

Isn't a variety of site prices, standards, and facilities a good thing? It would be awful if everything was the same, what might suit me won't suit some else and vice versa.

Just choose the site and price that gives you what you want for the price you want. 

Content has been removed.

The user and all related content has been Deleted User

I said  "…I don't see the point of making comparisons which will achieve nothing"  which isn’t quite the same thing.

Obviously price comparisons do achieve something for the end user.

And all we have is simple prices, no comparison of facilities, grass or HS, SP or anything else. These things help in deciding if that extra £10 is worth it.

The user and all related content has been Deleted User

Having not been that way I have no idea if the two sites are the same, even with your analysis, after all we are all different in what we like and see.

And I'm not sure what your last sentence is trying to say. I merely posted that other things play a part in deciding if something is worth the extra money, not everyone has seen them as you have so my post still stands.