Two tier membership

stu59 replied on 01/09/2022 18:56

Posted on 01/09/2022 18:56

I would like to propose a two tier membership to the Club.

The first tier would be full membership has it is now.

The second tier would be the use of CL Sites only.

If you held CL membership only, you could still use other club sites, but you would need to pay a nominal fee. This level would be ideal for those of us that only use CL sites and do not wish to use the larger sites that are now becoming more like commercial site.

Please discuss.

Thanks Stuart

Tammygirl replied on 04/09/2022 22:42

Posted on 02/09/2022 17:50 by TimboC

Oh, you're such a cynic DD!

£56 pa is a drop in the ocean for most people in order to access what many consider, me included, the best caravanning club in the UK. Not all the benefits are worth having, but many are. Its the same in all walks of life

Sure, its got its problems, but they pale into insignificance when pitched up on wonderful sites like Rookesbury and Malvern...which is where we are heading from next Wednesday.

I'll be sitting outside my caravan at Malvern, looking at the scruffy C&CC site opposite and writing out my cheque for next years membership.

I'm more than happy take it, with all its faults. 

Posted on 04/09/2022 22:42

Are you sure you have the right site 🤔

We've stayed on the CCC site at Malvern a few times and found it lovely, neatly cut grass, open and sunny pitches, 2 modern, warm and very nice facility blocks.

Took a walk next door to the £9 a night dearer CAMC site, it was depressing, tired and scruffy. Definitely not worth it's cost. 

Tammygirl replied on 04/09/2022 22:48

Posted on 02/09/2022 20:05 by TimboC

Our first was at Salisbury. We were told where to pitch, no choice at all, pitches were cramped and the shower block was only marginally better than the one I used in the 1970's when fruit picking in Norfolk. We booked for 3 nights and left after 2

I see on Trust Pilot they get 1.6 stars out of 5 vs CAMC at 4.2. Says it all really.

Posted on 04/09/2022 22:48

Stay there at least once a year as we have family near by. 

Never had an issue with the pitches, some are better than others but they are all big enough for a car/caravan and awning. Great views from the site, showers perfectly acceptable and have always been given a choice of pitches within the type we had booked.

Much better placed than CAMC site. 

young thomas replied on 05/09/2022 09:00

Posted on 02/09/2022 20:05 by TimboC

Our first was at Salisbury. We were told where to pitch, no choice at all, pitches were cramped and the shower block was only marginally better than the one I used in the 1970's when fruit picking in Norfolk. We booked for 3 nights and left after 2

I see on Trust Pilot they get 1.6 stars out of 5 vs CAMC at 4.2. Says it all really.

Posted on 05/09/2022 09:00

The Salisbury C&CC site is actually in Salisbury😉, not 9 miles away and a three hour walk or an hour on a bike...

TimboC replied on 05/09/2022 12:00

Posted on 05/09/2022 09:00 by young thomas

The Salisbury C&CC site is actually in Salisbury😉, not 9 miles away and a three hour walk or an hour on a bike...

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:00

And your point is ??

My critique was of the site, not where it is

TimboC replied on 05/09/2022 12:13

Posted on 04/09/2022 22:42 by Tammygirl

Are you sure you have the right site 🤔

We've stayed on the CCC site at Malvern a few times and found it lovely, neatly cut grass, open and sunny pitches, 2 modern, warm and very nice facility blocks.

Took a walk next door to the £9 a night dearer CAMC site, it was depressing, tired and scruffy. Definitely not worth it's cost. 

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:13

Hmmmm...let me think...Yes!

Each to their own Tammy, but I feel the need to stick up for the CAMC when so many people come onto this forum to slag it off. If you don't like it, vote with your wallet. I did with C&CC and didn't renew my membership.

I have no problem with paying for what I consider to be a premium service. Is it perfect? No. I'd give it 3.5 to 4 stars out of 5, and did so when invited to do so. But don't tell me that the grass is greener elsewhere, because I know from personal experience that it isn't. (IMHO)

SteveL replied on 05/09/2022 12:58

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:13 by TimboC

Hmmmm...let me think...Yes!

Each to their own Tammy, but I feel the need to stick up for the CAMC when so many people come onto this forum to slag it off. If you don't like it, vote with your wallet. I did with C&CC and didn't renew my membership.

I have no problem with paying for what I consider to be a premium service. Is it perfect? No. I'd give it 3.5 to 4 stars out of 5, and did so when invited to do so. But don't tell me that the grass is greener elsewhere, because I know from personal experience that it isn't. (IMHO)

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:58

I don’t see any need to stick up for the CAMC, they can do that for themselves if they feel the need.
In the case of Malvern both sites are perfectly acceptable and we would stay at either. Currently the C&CC site is preferred as we can book a HS.  If this club was continuing with its USP whilst also allowing surface type booking, I’m sure we would use their site in the future. However, if I am going to have to pay a deposit, I might as well save £8 a night, as we did when we stayed last September.

As to Salisbury location is always going to be a major factor now we have a MH, even if the site is not 4 / 5* However, as I put above Salisbury is perfectly acceptable on all counts. Again, because of ARD it is typically £7/8 a night less than a similar CAMC site, which is a bonus. 6 nights  more than covers our yearly subscription.

Cornersteady replied on 05/09/2022 12:59

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:13 by TimboC

Hmmmm...let me think...Yes!

Each to their own Tammy, but I feel the need to stick up for the CAMC when so many people come onto this forum to slag it off. If you don't like it, vote with your wallet. I did with C&CC and didn't renew my membership.

I have no problem with paying for what I consider to be a premium service. Is it perfect? No. I'd give it 3.5 to 4 stars out of 5, and did so when invited to do so. But don't tell me that the grass is greener elsewhere, because I know from personal experience that it isn't. (IMHO)

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:59

+1

TimboC replied on 05/09/2022 13:51

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:58 by SteveL

I don’t see any need to stick up for the CAMC, they can do that for themselves if they feel the need.
In the case of Malvern both sites are perfectly acceptable and we would stay at either. Currently the C&CC site is preferred as we can book a HS.  If this club was continuing with its USP whilst also allowing surface type booking, I’m sure we would use their site in the future. However, if I am going to have to pay a deposit, I might as well save £8 a night, as we did when we stayed last September.

As to Salisbury location is always going to be a major factor now we have a MH, even if the site is not 4 / 5* However, as I put above Salisbury is perfectly acceptable on all counts. Again, because of ARD it is typically £7/8 a night less than a similar CAMC site, which is a bonus. 6 nights  more than covers our yearly subscription.

Posted on 05/09/2022 13:51

I think they do Steve. They did that by asking for reviews, which was a positive and confident thing to do. But my original post was in response to a post that has now been Deleted User, either by CAMC or by the poster themselves, which was vitriolic in its condemnation of the Club.

Sadly, that means all subsequent posts are now out context, but our opinion is that, on balance, we would rather spend our money with CAMC and pay the extra, having had bad experiences elsewhere. I appreciate that others have a different opinion, and am open minded to giving them another try if I can be convinced that things have improved.

I'll have a walk around the Malvern site and report back!

TimboC replied on 05/09/2022 13:55

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:13 by TimboC

Hmmmm...let me think...Yes!

Each to their own Tammy, but I feel the need to stick up for the CAMC when so many people come onto this forum to slag it off. If you don't like it, vote with your wallet. I did with C&CC and didn't renew my membership.

I have no problem with paying for what I consider to be a premium service. Is it perfect? No. I'd give it 3.5 to 4 stars out of 5, and did so when invited to do so. But don't tell me that the grass is greener elsewhere, because I know from personal experience that it isn't. (IMHO)

Posted on 05/09/2022 13:55

PS. I didn't mean to suggest that you were slagging them, and apologies if thats the impression I gave

young thomas replied on 05/09/2022 17:01

Posted on 05/09/2022 12:00 by TimboC

And your point is ??

My critique was of the site, not where it is

Posted on 05/09/2022 17:01

My point is 'location, location, location'...the club has a knack of naming sites after places that aren't in the vicinity...Bath Chew Valley is 13 miles from Bath. Bishop Sutton Chew Valley CAMC (or even Lopcombe Corner CAMC in the case of Salisbury) site doesn't have the same ring to it.

Many use specific sites as they are where they want to be, quite a few that want to be in Salisbury would use a site in....wait for it....Salisbury. Hence the C&CC site being pretty busy most of the time.

What is the 'premium service' you pay for? I'm a member, do I get it, too?

Near Malvern Hills Club Campsite by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook