AGM Questions - Some relevant to CLs

Your post link says, "agm questions and answers" but at the end of the link it states there are no answers.

Am I missing something?

 Have you clicked on the + at the right of each question?

Doh!

Why didn't I see that

Thanks

It's not immediately apparent at all, I've learnt by experience on websites to hunt for the links. 

I was hoping a Mr Jeffrey Carr (one of those who asked a question) might be a user of CT.  Any further explanation will likely mean my comment (or complete post) will be Deleted User.

I could only find a couple of questions and neither of those were answered fully in any way. Plenty of Blah, Blah, Blah though!!

I was just thinking the same Nellie. They must have been listening to PMQ's to see how it was done.

Ted

Perhaps the wrong question was asked? I think you are alluding to the system that you and some other CL owners have come up with to provide a more modern way for members to book CL's? Should the question have been, now that we have the basis of an online booking system in place could it not be adopted by the Club for wider use? I understand your reticence talking about it. Perhaps the Club see it as giving some CL owners an advantage over those less inclined to get involved, rather than it being a step forward for members?

David

This thread appears to have been moved to the CL section, and the Thread about "CL's instead of Sites" moved from the CL section to "Making things cheaper".

There is nothing in the Q&A attachment of any real interest or relevance to CL's except one question which isn't answered.The forum seems a bit manipulated to me.

Threads are moved to where they are most relevant. This thread is  about the AGM responses to questions asked about CL's so should surely be in the CL section? The other thread you mention is about value so probably the reason it was moved to the section it now occupies? Sometimes its a fine line as to where discussions are moved to and probably the CL's instead of Sites could have been in any of three sections? I don't know about manipulation but I would have thought there was some value in putting threads where they are on topic and will get the maximum discussion?

David