Adult only sites & number of dogs

yes, a singular good post. 

There was/is the oportunity  for the vocal few who can find fault with anything cc  to put their more often than not very misguided ideas of how they think it should be run, but by the the lack of comments from any ,it seems as usual just hot air while looking at their image

You make a good point there micky. You have posted a number of  coherent structured posts.

If you disagree with them, which is easier to do? Make a similar coherent structured reply and point out in detail how and where you have made any misconceptions and inaccuracies, or where you continue to make a lot of mistakes and tend to miss the central point,

or be patronising and just post such comments without any such detail, reasoning and counter arguments?

Which approach has more credence? Who is posting something they believe in?

+1 (as stated I my previous post)

Owing to the amount of reports I've received from this thread, I'll be closing this pending investigation.

Micky, I've given you a like for your post. It is well thought out and beautifully written and presented.  On a forum people, even if they disagree, can be friendly and appreciate a well presented post. Well done.

This is just a forum, its not real life,  Nothing discussed here will affect what happens at Grimstead Towers. So it is strange how much in the way of insults and thread spoiling occurs due to those handfull of posters who do not have your intellectual ability but share your views.

My advice to those people is to study your posting style and try to repicate your intellectual presentation. Up until then you will be the only ardent  CC supporter whose posts I will be bothered reading

Cheers............K

Very true, having suggested I had mistakes in my posts, I requested explanation from these fellow members. No explanation, no substance forthcoming, just a duplicated non substanciated and quite frankly, rather patronising retort. Very, very poor debating skills in my opinion and reminiscent of other 'arguments' we have been witnessed when in the deaththrows of defeat. They wish not to discus but choose to ignore those that do try to add comment in friendly and helpful ways. I think it only fair that they should be given the chance to substantiate claims of my alleged mistakes but I won't be holding my breath. In the meantime, I deem that, as previously stated, the facts I produced just simply did not fit their opinion.