Co 2

Posted on 21/09/2021 21:11 by Fisherman

We seem to be spending vast amounts on storing, trapping and reducing co2. yet today we see that we are now generating the stuff to keep food on the supermarket shelves longer. Does any of this make sense?

Posted on 22/09/2021 18:31 by Fisherman

All actions have consequences. 2 examples.  The drive to reduce  the use of Agricultural fertilizers means no CO2 to keep chickens fresh on supermarket shelves.  The spokesman for the M25 protest was shown not to have insulated his home despite qualifying for a grant. Their argument shot down. Plenty more examples where things are not fully not  thoroughly though through. Not getting into a discussion with Rocky as that gets post locked down.

Posted on 22/09/2021 18:51 by

Not sure that there is a connection there TDA. 

Posted on 22/09/2021 18:31 by Fisherman

All actions have consequences. 2 examples.  The drive to reduce  the use of Agricultural fertilizers means no CO2 to keep chickens fresh on supermarket shelves.  The spokesman for the M25 protest was shown not to have insulated his home despite qualifying for a grant. Their argument shot down. Plenty more examples where things are not fully not  thoroughly though through. Not getting into a discussion with Rocky as that gets post locked down.

Posted on 22/09/2021 18:51 by

Not sure that there is a connection there TDA. 

Posted on 22/09/2021 23:00

• Quote
• Report
• Like

There ya go-facts.

Gallery

Posted on 22/09/2021 23:00 by Rocky 2 buckets

There ya go-facts.

Posted on 23/09/2021 00:39 by

I knew that but it was mention of welfare that threw me

Posted on 23/09/2021 08:40 by Fisherman

No large energy user would be reliant on the spot price .Like all their commodities they would have long term contracts in hand. So the temporary hike should not effect them like this.