Too much information

JohnM20 replied on 11/04/2021 11:45

Posted on 11/04/2021 11:45

Does anyone else get frustrated by the amount of information superimposed on TV screens especially during important events. The BBC is the worst offender I think.

During the many Covid briefings from Downing Street there have been at least three different strap-lines, one at the top telling us that the picture is' Live from Downing Street' (but not, of course, if you have recorded it)Towards the bottom of the screen is 'BBC News' frequently telling us that Boris or others will be leading the briefing that is already on and that we are trying to watch and then a second ticker-tape line at the bottom of the screen of 'Breaking News' some of which we have just heard Boris etc telling us and some completely irrelevant to the matter in hand. These two lower lines in particular block out a good proportion of the screen, often making important information shown at the bottom of the graphs completely invisible. The lower part of a person's head is also frequently obliterated.

The same thing happened yesterday during the 41 gun salute for Prince Philip. Many of the guns couldn't actually be seen for the same reason as above, particularly Cardiff Castle. Why broadcast something that can't be seen. I may as well listen to the radio.

Do the producers of these programmes never actually look at what they are broadcasting or do the copy writers just believe in their own self importance and believe that their wordage is more important than the picture that they are covering up?

DavidKlyne replied on 11/04/2021 20:43

Posted on 11/04/2021 20:43

I think we need to get this in perspective. The BBC has a duty to cover such events in depth, hopefully most would understand this. The complaint as I see it is not about the coverage but the fact that they decided to run the exact same programming over three channels and completely take another off air. I perfectly understand that BBC1 and the BBC News Channel would have the same content as they reach different audiences. The puzzlement is why they needed to run the same content on BBC2 and close BBC4. It could be of course that they felt it was disrespectful to run "light entertainment" on other of their channels given the seriousness of the occasion. It will be interesting to see the BBC's reaction to the complaints they have received?

David

Takethedogalong replied on 11/04/2021 20:55

Posted on 11/04/2021 20:55

You were right in an earlier comment DK. They are damned if they do, damned if they don’t. I recall Beeb being considered a tad irreverent at the time of the Queen Mother’s funeral, mainly because one of the news readers hadn’t been wearing a black tie.

But it’s a paid for service nowadays, whilst still purporting to be the “National” broadcaster. 

 

 

Rocky 2 buckets replied on 11/04/2021 20:55

Posted on 11/04/2021 19:43 by

The talk of “cohorts” in this context is making me a little uneasy.

If the thread to which you make reference is the one about facility blocks then I did express an opinion yesterday which ran counter to yours, and others expressing similar thoughts to you. I found myself in agreement with JVB (that has to be a first for me). Because I expressed  a similar opinion I’d hate to be judged to part of a disruptive cohort.

On this matter, on this thread, I totally agree with thoughts expressed by those making the point about freedom of choice. One person with whom I agreed yesterday now expresses a different view from mine on this thread. So today I am in the opposite “cohort” as it were, to that I might have been deemed to belong yesterday.

“I am not a member of a cohort I am a free man,” as some (fictional) person once nearly said.

On the matter of balance and respect, TTDA says it perfectly above I think.  

And, with ref to Rufs' point about expressing a minority view: one is allowed to be part of a minority you know. It does not make one’s opinion not worth having.

Posted on 11/04/2021 20:55

I’m sorry WTG but you have me stumped, you were never mentioned nor even intimated at🤷🏻‍♂️. I’d love to understand your post.

PS-‘freedom of choice’, yup me too👍🏻

SteveL replied on 11/04/2021 21:02

Posted on 11/04/2021 20:55 by Takethedogalong

You were right in an earlier comment DK. They are damned if they do, damned if they don’t. I recall Beeb being considered a tad irreverent at the time of the Queen Mother’s funeral, mainly because one of the news readers hadn’t been wearing a black tie.

But it’s a paid for service nowadays, whilst still purporting to be the “National” broadcaster. 

 

 

Posted on 11/04/2021 21:02

I suppose it was a paid for service at one time, when it was all that was available. However, now what you are paying for is the right to receive transmissions over  the air. It does not matter if you never watch BBC programmes but only Pick or CBS, you still have to pay.

Tinwheeler replied on 11/04/2021 21:16

Posted on 11/04/2021 21:02 by SteveL

I suppose it was a paid for service at one time, when it was all that was available. However, now what you are paying for is the right to receive transmissions over  the air. It does not matter if you never watch BBC programmes but only Pick or CBS, you still have to pay.

Posted on 11/04/2021 21:16

Isn’t it a paid for service now, Steve, as it's funded by the licence fee?

replied on 11/04/2021 21:50

Posted on 11/04/2021 20:55 by Rocky 2 buckets

I’m sorry WTG but you have me stumped, you were never mentioned nor even intimated at🤷🏻‍♂️. I’d love to understand your post.

PS-‘freedom of choice’, yup me too👍🏻

Posted on 11/04/2021 21:50

The user and all related content has been deleted

SteveL replied on 11/04/2021 21:57

Posted on 11/04/2021 21:57

My point was what you are paying for is the right to receive electronic transmissions. Personally I am happy to pay for the news alone.

However, if I never watched BBC coverage, I would still have to pay. I might then be indirectly funding the BBC, but I wouldn’t be paying to watch their output. There is a subtle difference. In the past when it was the only option, if you didn’t want it you wouldn’t buy a TV license.

SteveL replied on 11/04/2021 22:50

Posted on 11/04/2021 22:29 by Takethedogalong

This explains the License Fee.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-51376255

if you own and use a TV, or stream programmes in the UK, you have to pay the License Fee, even if you never watch or listen to anything broadcast by the BBC. You pay to watch anything broadcast/streamed to any device. 

Posted on 11/04/2021 22:50

I think that’s what I said.

Near Malvern Hills Club Campsite by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook